Case Study · Texas · Assisted Living and Memory Care · HUD 232
Assisted Living and Memory Care Feasibility Study, Boerne, Texas: New Construction on a HUD Section 232 Loan
Representative worked example. The site, sponsor and project are hypothetical. The market evidence comes from the public sources listed below, with their dates. This page shows how the market analysis is built and how it sets the loan. It is not a client engagement.
Boerne has what an assisted living market needs: fast growth, an older population, high home equity and only two scaled communities. What it does not have is rents high enough to carry new-construction debt at HUD's coverage floor. A hypothetical 83-unit community costs $31,068,599; at the sponsor's requested 10.0% equity, stabilized income covers debt service only 0.71x. Sized to the 1.45x floor, the insured loan is $14,664,379 and the sponsor carries 52.8% of cost.
The Boerne assisted living case in one table.
| Item | Finding |
|---|---|
| Location | Boerne, Kendall County, Texas, in the San Antonio metro, in the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction near the I-10 corridor [1] |
| Subject | Hypothetical new-construction community: 59 assisted living and 24 memory care units, 75,350 sq ft on 4.4 acres |
| Program | HUD Section 232 new construction, FHA-insured; sizing terms from lender and broker summaries (secondary) [34][58] |
| Total project cost | $31,068,599, or $374,320 a unit |
| Loan structure | Insured loan $14,664,379 at 6.00% plus 0.77% premium, 40 years; annual debt service $1,081,141 |
| Equity | 52.8% ($16,404,220), against 10.0% proposed |
| DSCR in the test year | 1.45x in Year 3 (proposed loan: 0.71x); 1.08x in Year 2 |
| Break-even | 65.6% average occupancy in Year 3, a 25.5% cushion |
| Market conclusion | Strong, older, high-equity demand and thin supply; local rates are too low for a 90.0% new-construction loan |
| Determination as proposed | Fails: a 90.0% loan to cost ($29,765,234) covers stabilized debt service 0.71x, below the 1.45x floor |
| Determination as restructured | Meets: insured loan cut to $14,664,379 and equity raised to 52.8%; coverage 1.45x in Year 3, with the operating deficit escrow carrying the lease-up; the 75% value test needs an appraisal of at least $19,552,505 |
Demand supports a new community; local rents do not support a 90% insured loan.
Boerne, the Kendall County seat about 35 miles northwest of downtown San Antonio [4], had 24,047 residents on July 1, 2025, up 34.6% since April 2020 while the nation grew 3.1% [1][2]. Its residents are older and wealthier than most fast-growth suburbs: 17.1% are 65 or over, the median household income is $84,541 and the median owner-occupied home is worth $457,900 [1]. Home equity is what pays for private-pay assisted living, and Boerne has a great deal of it.
Supply is thin. The trade area holds two scaled assisted living and memory care communities, Franklin Park Boerne and Morningside's Cibolo House, plus a handful of small licensed homes and one nursing facility with secured memory units. No new assisted living or memory care project was found in Boerne's planning records, state construction registrations or local news for 2025 and 2026; the only senior housing in the pipeline is Morningside's own independent-living expansion. On demand and competition alone, a new purpose-built community is a reasonable proposition.
The constraint is price. No operator posts rates, and the aggregator quotes for Boerne and Fair Oaks Ranch sit well below national averages: a one-bedroom at Franklin Park is quoted at $3,930 a month [10], against a national assisted living median of $6,200 in 2025 [54]. New construction costs what it costs everywhere: CBRE put the average development cost of recent senior housing at $388,830 per unit [45]. A building priced at national cost and rented at Boerne rates produces a stabilized income too small for HUD's coverage floor.
That is what the model shows. The hypothetical 83-unit community costs $31,068,599, or $374,320 a unit. The sponsor's opening request, the maximum loan to cost with 10.0% equity, would cover stabilized debt service only 0.71x in Year 3. Sized to the 1.45x new-construction floor, the insured loan falls to $14,664,379 and the sponsor's equity rises to $16,404,220, or 52.8% of cost.
The market conclusion is therefore split. The community would likely fill: national assisted living occupancy reached 89.1% in the third quarter of 2026 [48], and Boerne's supply is limited. The debt is the problem. A lender should treat this as a project for a sponsor with deep equity or a lower-cost building, and should expect the appraiser's market study to test the rate assumptions harder than any other input.
An older, high-equity population growing several times faster than the nation.
The trade area is about a ten-mile radius around Boerne, taking in Fair Oaks Ranch and the I-10 corridor south toward Leon Springs. Census estimates are published for the city, not for a radius, so the table uses city figures; a drive-time tabulation of age- and income-qualified households was not found and is a lender condition. HUD's draft appraisal chapter expects the primary market area to supply 60 to 80 percent of a community's demand [43], which is why the radius, not the city line, is what the appraiser will draw.
Three features of Boerne's population matter for assisted living. First, the growth is long-running: the city's 2010 census count was 10,471 and its 2020 count 17,850 [1], and a StorageCafe study ranked it 63rd among the fastest-growing U.S. cities, with 67% growth from 2014 to 2023 [4]. Growth of that kind brings the adult children who usually choose a parent's community. Second, the age profile: 17.1% of residents are 65 or over, and the median age is 38.7 on a secondary source [1][3]. Third, the means to pay: 64.5% of homes are owner-occupied, 47.6% of adults hold a bachelor's degree or more, and only 6.8% of residents are in poverty [1]. The 1,270 veterans in the city are a small additional pool for VA pension benefits that can help pay for care [1].
The national backdrop helps. NIC reports that the 75-and-over population is growing nearly 4% a year while senior housing inventory grows about 1% [51]. Memory care penetration of 75-plus households rose from 1.2% to 1.4% between 2017 and 2023 [52], and the Alzheimer's Association estimates 7.4 million Americans 65 and over live with Alzheimer's dementia, about 11% of that age group [55]. Texas had about 1,400 residential care communities with 61,200 licensed beds in the 2020 national survey [56].
The local health care base is a gap. Boerne's health care and social assistance receipts were $207,294 thousand in 2022 [1], but the research could not document an inpatient hospital in the city or a source for the status of a planned regional hospital. Hospital discharges drive many assisted living move-ins, and memory care referrals come from physicians and geriatric practices. The referral base is a lender condition.
| Indicator | Boerne | Comparison | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 2020 census 17,850; 2010 census 10,471 | July 1, 2025 | [1] |
| Population change | +34.6% | United States +3.1% | April 2020 to July 2025 | [2] |
| Households; persons per household | 7,548; 2.63 | n/a | ACS 2020 to 2024 | [1] |
| Persons 65 and over | 17.1% | n/a | July 1, 2025 | [1] |
| Median household income; per capita income | $84,541; $46,343 | n/a | ACS 2020 to 2024 (2024 dollars) | [1] |
| Median owner-occupied home value | $457,900 | n/a | ACS 2020 to 2024 | [1] |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 64.5% | n/a | ACS 2020 to 2024 | [1] |
| Mean travel time to work | 25.3 minutes | n/a | ACS 2020 to 2024 | [1] |
| Median age (secondary) | 38.7 | n/a | 2024 | [3] |
| 75 and over population against senior housing inventory | n/a | U.S. population nearly 4% a year; inventory about 1% | Entering 2026 | [51] |
| Memory care penetration of 75+ households | n/a | U.S. 1.2% rising to 1.4% | 2017 to 2023 | [52] |
| Assisted living occupancy | n/a | U.S. 89.1% (88.3% in 2Q 2026) | 3Q 2026 | [48] |
| Drive-time qualified households, daytime employment, hospital admissions | NOT FOUND | NOT FOUND | n/a | Lender condition |
Two scaled communities, three small homes and a nursing facility.
Each community below is confirmed by its operator's website or a state registry record, linked in the last column. Rates are aggregator quotes, because no operator posts prices online; capacities come from directories that republish state licence data, and the research could not pull the HHSC licence records themselves.
| Community | Operator and type | Location | Size and licence | Rates and other evidence | Confirming record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin Park Boerne | Franklin Park; assisted living and memory care, opened 2017 | 18 Old San Antonio Rd, Boerne | 76 apartments (developer lists 46 AL and 32 MC, which sums to 78); licensed for 96 beds with 38 Alzheimer beds; licence held since July 17, 2017, current to July 17, 2027 [9] | One-bedroom AL $3,930, studio $4,975, two-bedroom $6,430 a month, October 2026 [10] | Operator site, checked October 15, 2026 |
| Morningside at Menger Springs, Cibolo House | Morningside Ministries, non-profit life plan campus (independent living, AL, memory care, rehab); campus opened 2004 [12] | 1000 Grand Blvd, Boerne | 42-acre campus; licensed capacity unresolved across directories | The Vistas expansion "slated to open in 2027"; page modified September 24, 2026 [11] | Operator site, checked October 15, 2026 |
| Wholehearted Senior Living at Boerne | Independent; small licensed home | 112 Buckskin Dr, Boerne | Licensed for 15, no Alzheimer beds; first licensed May 9, 2008 [16] | Private assisted living room from $6,500 a month, October 2026 [17] | Operator site, checked October 15, 2026 |
| Hummingbird Assisted Living and Memory Care | Family-owned; licensed AL and memory care, opened 2023 | 8602 Flint Rock Dr, Boerne | 16 private bedrooms with baths [18] | Staff ratio 1:5 by day and 1:8 at night; all-inclusive pricing with no levels of care [18] | Operator site, checked October 15, 2026 |
| Anton's Assisted Living | Independent; small licensed home | 1033 E Blanco Rd, Boerne | Capacity 10; about 3,500 sq ft built for an estimated $500,000, registered March 7, 2019 [19] | Memory care from $5,160 a month, October 2026 [20] | TDLR record, checked October 16, 2026 |
| Avir at Boerne | Avir Health Group; skilled nursing with secured memory units | 1102 River Rd, Boerne | 96 units; Medicare overall rating "Much below average" [22] | From $6,280 a month, September 2026 [23] | Operator site, checked October 2026 |
Two more communities are in the research but could not be confirmed by an operator website or a registry record, so they stay out of the table. Heritage Place of Boerne, at 120 Crosspoint Dr, is listed in directories as an assisted living community licensed for 56 with no Alzheimer certification, opened in 1999 [12], quoted from $3,500 for a one-bedroom [14] and rated 4.5 on 85 resident and family ratings by U.S. News [13]; only a chamber of commerce listing confirms it locally [15]. Hill Country Assisted Living, a ten-bed home on W Fabra Ln, appears in a directory with a licence whose current status was not verified [21]. Both are named here as unconfirmed, and checking them against HHSC records is a lender condition.
Read as supply, the census says three things. Franklin Park, opened in 2017, is the only scaled stand-alone community selling assisted living and memory care to the open market, and its quoted rates are modest. The life plan campus serves its own residents first and is growing independent living, which will feed its own assisted living over time rather than the open market. The rest is small residential homes, sized as the census table shows, which compete on price and intimacy but cannot offer the amenity package of a new building. Avir is a nursing facility; its secured units serve residents who need more care than an assisted living licence allows, and its below-average Medicare rating gives families a reason to look elsewhere.
The next ring is in northwest San Antonio. The Waterford at Shavano Park opened in 2024 with 84 assisted living and memory care units, and two Stone Oak communities, The Haven and The Laurels, have 60 and 94 units [12]. They compete for the same adult children who work in San Antonio. Market benchmarks for Fair Oaks Ranch, between the two, are $4,534 for a one-bedroom and $3,779 shared in assisted living, and $6,027 and $5,023 in memory care [24].
The pipeline is quiet. Morningside's 51-unit independent living expansion, a $30 million project, was to begin construction in November 2025 under its state registration [25], and the operator lists The Vistas as its last and most ambitious planned phase [11]. Commercial growth on I-10 continues: Boerne's Planning and Zoning Commission approved the final plat for a Buc-ee's travel center on January 12, 2026 [26]. Two caveats: rates came from aggregators and conflict in places (one listing for Wholehearted quotes memory care below its assisted living price), and the research could not obtain a waitlist or occupancy figure for any competitor. A phone survey of rates and vacancies is a lender condition.
An extraterritorial tract near I-10: no zoning, but utilities to confirm.
The subject is a hypothetical 4.4-acre tract in the City of Boerne's extraterritorial jurisdiction, near the I-10 corridor. The acreage is the national median site for a combined assisted living and memory care community in fiscal 2024 [44]. Land is priced at $300,000 an acre, a round assumption inside the range two cited Boerne asks set, and an appraisal will set the value: 2.56 acres on I-10 at $1,200,000, listed January 30, 2026 and under option [5], and a 45.4-acre tract listed at $8,000,000 on one portal, with higher asks on others [6]. Undeveloped land in the ETJ often carries an agricultural exemption that rolls back on development; the rollback amount for the tract bought is a condition.
Zoning and approvals
The ETJ has no municipal zoning, so the use is not a zoning question; the city's platting and site development rules still apply [7]. Boerne's Planning and Zoning Commission meets at 6 pm on the first Monday of each month, and plat submittals are due about a month before each meeting [33]. The end-to-end approval timeline was not found. Licensing runs through Texas HHSC: the facility licence (Form 3720), an Alzheimer certification for the memory care wing (Form 3721) and a $15 per bed fee for a capacity increase [31]. The building also needs an architectural barriers registration and inspection with TDLR [32]. The research found no certificate-of-need requirement for assisted living in Texas; licensing, not a need test, is the state gate.
Utilities
Water, wastewater and gas service for an ETJ site are conditions to confirm before the loan is sized. The City of Boerne owns its electric, natural gas, water, wastewater and reclaimed water systems [8], but whether this ETJ location falls in Boerne's electric and gas service areas was not found. Utility costs are rising: commercial water rates rose 7% and wastewater 3% in February 2025, with a further 7% base water increase on October 1, 2025 [29]. Boerne's FY2026 utilities capital plan is funded with $15 million of impact fees and $650,000 of developer funds [30], but the per-unit impact fee schedule was not found. Service area, capacity and impact fees are lender conditions.
Access, flood, environment and taxes
No TxDOT count was found for the site's roads, no FEMA flood zone, no environmental report and no appraisal district parcel record. Each becomes a condition. On taxes, the ETJ location avoids the city levy: the combined 2025 rate is $1.3929 per $100 (Kendall County $0.3770, Boerne ISD $1.0109 and the Cow Creek groundwater district $0.005), against $1.8645 inside city limits [27]. The school district rate includes a voter-approved increase that passed on November 4, 2025 with 51.2% [28]. Licensed assisted living does not collect hotel occupancy tax [27]. The model taxes land, building and furnishings at cost, because no assessment basis was found.
Local rates, a new-building premium and a three-year lease-up.
| Line | Basis | Year 1 | Year 3 | Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assisted living | units x rate x occupancy | $1,291,392 | $3,767,604 | $3,997,051 |
| Memory care | units x rate x occupancy | $691,200 | $2,016,559 | $2,139,367 |
| Total revenue | $1,982,592 | $5,784,163 | $6,136,418 |
The community has 59 assisted living and 24 memory care units, the national median size for a combined community [44]. Revenue is units times the monthly rate times occupancy, with rates rising each year.
Rates. Assisted living opens at $5,700 a month, with care. That is near the top of Boerne's quoted range and slightly above the $5,658 South Central regional fee with care in fiscal 2024 [44]; it is below the national median of $6,200 [54]. Memory care opens at $7,500, against $7,298 for the South Central region [44] and local quotes from $5,160 [20]. A new building commands a premium over a 2017 one, but the size of that premium in Boerne is untested. The national level-of-care add-on averaged $1,201 a month in assisted living and $1,979 in memory care in fiscal 2024 [44], and Boerne quotes rarely say whether care is included, which is one reason the phone survey matters.
Rate growth. The model raises rates 3.0% a year. NIC MAP reported in-place assisted living rates up 5.3% and asking rates up 5.3% year over year in June 2026, with move-in discounts equal to about 1.1 months of rent [49]. A community in lease-up discounts to fill, so the model stays below the market's current pace.
Occupancy. Average occupancy is 88.0% by Year 3. NIC describes lease-up as an S-curve that stabilizes in years three to four [50], and the research found no figure for move-ins per month. The stabilized level sits between the 89.1% national assisted living rate in the third quarter of 2026 [48] and the 86.6% median for combined communities in fiscal 2024 [44]. Memory care fills differently: residents arrive in crisis, often on a hospital discharge, and stay a median 18.2 months in a stand-alone memory care setting against 25.5 months in assisted living [44]. Faster turnover means the wing must keep leasing even after it stabilizes.
On these drivers, Year 3 revenue is $5,784,163. No community fees, second-person fees or ancillary income are counted, because the research has no figures for them; they are upside the appraiser may support.
Staffing sets the cost base, and it arrives before the residents do.
| Line | Basis | Year 1 | Year 3 | Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labor, food, utilities, insurance, marketing and administration | [44] benchmark | $2,366,224 | $3,586,181 | $3,804,579 |
| Management fee | [44] | $99,130 | $289,208 | $306,821 |
| Property tax | [27] | $307,913 | $307,913 | $307,913 |
| Replacement reserve | assumption | $33,200 | $33,200 | $33,200 |
| Total operating expenses | $2,806,466 | $4,216,502 | $4,452,513 | |
| Net operating income | ($823,874) | $1,567,660 | $1,683,905 |
Labor is the largest cost in assisted living and the reason lease-up is expensive. At the median combined community in fiscal 2024, labor was 47.2% of revenue, total operating expense 77.7% and the management fee 5.0%, leaving a 22.3% net operating margin [44]. Stand-alone assisted living did better, at a 34.1% margin, and memory care worse, at 19.3% [44]. Public operators sit between: Brookdale's assisted living and memory care segment earned a 26.8% margin in fiscal 2025 [63] and Sonida's same-store margin was 32.6% in the second quarter of 2026 [62].
The model carries operating costs other than management, tax and reserves at 62.0% of revenue at stabilization, and never below 70.0% of the stabilized cost while the building fills. That floor is what produces the Year 1 loss: a licensed community must staff its care and memory care neighborhoods around the clock from the first resident, and Hummingbird's stated 1:5 daytime and 1:8 night ratios show how quickly a small census becomes expensive [18]. The management fee is 5.0% of revenue, the median in the national survey [44].
Property tax is the line most specific to Boerne. At the ETJ rate, tax on the land, building and furnishings at cost is a meaningful share of income, and the research found no assessment ratio and no evidence of how the appraisal district values new seniors housing. A non-profit sponsor might qualify for an exemption, as Morningside's campus may (its status was not verified), but this sponsor is for-profit. The replacement reserve of $400 a unit is a placeholder for the amount HUD sets at firm commitment.
Total operating expense is $4,216,502 in Year 3, leaving $1,567,660 of net operating income, a 27.1% margin. That is above the national median for combined communities and below the public operators' best quarters, a reasonable place for a new building with a professional manager.
National development costs, a Boerne land price and HUD's escrows.
| Use of funds | Basis | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land | assumption; site size [44] | $1,320,000 | 4.2% |
| Hard construction cost | [45] | $19,798,212 | 63.7% |
| Hard-cost contingency | assumption | $989,911 | 3.2% |
| Soft costs (design, permits, licensing, developer costs) | [45] | $4,426,812 | 14.2% |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | [45] | $987,700 | 3.2% |
| Initial operating deficit escrow | assumption | $1,600,000 | 5.1% |
| Construction-period interest and MIP | [47] build period; on the average loan balance | $992,778 | 3.2% |
| HUD, lender, legal and title fees | assumption | $366,609 | 1.2% |
| Working capital escrow | [34] | $586,575 | 1.9% |
| Total project cost | $31,068,599 | 100.0% |
| Source of funds | As proposed | Share | As restructured | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUD 232 insured mortgage | $29,765,234 | 90.0% | $14,664,379 | 47.2% |
| Sponsor equity | $3,307,248 | 10.0% | $16,404,220 | 52.8% |
| Total sources | $33,072,482 | 100.0% | $31,068,599 | 100.0% |
Construction is priced from CBRE's 2026 survey of 36 senior housing projects: hard costs of $262.75 per sq ft, soft costs of $58.75 and furnishings of $11,900 a unit [45], applied to the 75,350 sq ft median combined community [44]. CBRE's average total cost was $388,830 per unit, up 23.6% since its prior survey [45]. Weitz's 2026 cost brief puts mid-level assisted living hard costs at $281 to $358 per sq ft before sitework, at a city index of 100 [46]; San Antonio's index was not found, so a hard-cost contingency is carried until HUD's cost review. Construction takes 24 months from groundbreaking to opening, the national lag NIC MAP reported in July 2026 [47], and interest and premium during construction are mortgageable.
Three HUD items sit on top. The working capital escrow is 4% of the loan on lender and broker summaries [34][59]; a draft HUD letter proposes cutting the new-construction figure to 2% plus a mortgageable contingency, but its final status was not found [42]. The initial operating deficit escrow is sized by HUD from the lease-up cash flows on Form HUD-91128-ORCF [43]; the model carries a placeholder. Fees are a placeholder share of the loan around the 0.3% application fee in one lender's term sheet [58]. Total project cost is $31,068,599, or $374,320 a unit.
Against that cost, the national market price of an existing community was $182,800 a unit in the fourth quarter of 2025 [50]. Buying existing communities has been far cheaper than building them, which is why so little new construction is financed, and why the appraiser's "as completed and stabilized" value may come in well below cost. If it does, the value test, not the cost test, limits the loan.
How Section 232 sizes a new-construction loan, and which terms are still secondary.
| Tranche | Lender | Amount | Rate | Amortization | Annual debt service |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUD 232 insured mortgage | HUD-approved lender (FHA-insured) | $14,664,379 | 6.00% plus 0.77% MIP | 40 years | $1,081,141 |
| Total debt | $14,664,379 | $1,081,141 |
Rate: Assumption: The research has no dated Section 232 rate. The 10-year Treasury was 4.23% on March 11, 2026 [60]; the model uses 6.00% fixed, set at rate lock. MIP: Source [64]. Term: Source [58].
A Section 232 new-construction loan is the lesser of three amounts: 90% of eligible cost, 75% of the appraised value (80% for a non-profit borrower) and the loan whose debt service the projected income covers at 1.45x [34][58]. The working capital escrow adds 4% of the loan [34]. Those figures come from lender and broker summaries; HUD's Handbook 4232.1 was not fetched, so they rest on secondary sources, and the lender must confirm each against the handbook and its own term sheet. The model tests the cost and coverage limits; the value test needs the appraisal and is a condition. At 75.0% of value, the restructured loan needs an appraisal of at least $19,552,505, 62.9% of project cost; the sponsor's full-cost request would need 120.0% of cost, a value a community still in lease-up is unlikely to reach.
The term is 40 years after construction, with no personal liability, on one lender's term sheet [58]. The rate is an assumption: the research has no dated Section 232 rate, the 10-year Treasury was 4.23% on March 11, 2026 [60], and the model uses 6.00% fixed. The annual mortgage insurance premium is the most uncertain term. HUD set 0.25% for FHA multifamily insurance programs for applications from October 1, 2025 [36], but earlier 2025 Mortgagee Letters on premiums and loan limits said their changes did not apply to the health care programs, Section 232 included [35], and the research never finds the 0.25% applied to a Section 232 loan. The last Section 232 rate table in the research, in HUD's June 2025 notice ending the green premium category, lists 0.77% for new construction without tax credits [64]. The model uses 0.77%, the higher rate. If the lender confirms a lower Section 232 premium in writing, debt service falls and the loan can grow.
The market study rules matter as much as the loan terms. For new construction, the appraisal must include a complete market study written by the same appraiser, who may not be affiliated with the originator, broker, developer, borrower or lender; the lender orders and pays for it, and HUD is a named user [43]. The study must map every independent living, assisted living, memory care and nursing facility in the market, existing, under construction or planned, forecast monthly cash flows to stabilization and be submitted within 120 days of its effective date [43]. That chapter is a draft redline whose final adoption was not found. A draft HUD letter also says valuations that look inflated, with aggressive or poorly supported assumptions, "will be heavily scrutinized" [42]. A sponsor's feasibility study, like this one, comes before all of that: it tells the sponsor whether the appraisal is likely to support the loan.
The program's recent record explains why a lender will be careful. Firm commitments for Section 232 reached $8.1 billion in fiscal 2025, against $4.1 billion the year before, and the application backlog fell from 130 to 29 [37]. Almost all of that was refinancing: only seven of 337 closings were new construction and other [38]. HUD's Inspector General reported in April 2026 that 167 of 3,670 Section 232 borrowers, nearly 5%, were in default as of June 2024, with more than $1.1 billion of unpaid principal, and that the office overseeing them fell from 61 staff to 38 between October 2024 and May 2025 [39]. Seniors housing was also the weak spot at Fannie Mae, where its serious delinquency rate was 4.09% in March 2025 against 0.63% for the whole multifamily book [41]. Agency loans are an alternative only after stabilization: Freddie Mac's seniors term sheet calls for 1.40x coverage and up to 75% loan to value for assisted living [40]. Our conventional and institutional practice covers how we prepare HUD and agency files.
A first-year loss, a second-year recovery and stabilized income from Year 3.
| Line | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assisted living | $1,291,392 | $2,992,801 | $3,767,604 | $3,880,632 | $3,997,051 |
| Memory care | $691,200 | $1,601,856 | $2,016,559 | $2,077,055 | $2,139,367 |
| Total revenue | $1,982,592 | $4,594,657 | $5,784,163 | $5,957,687 | $6,136,418 |
| Labor, food, utilities, insurance, marketing and administration | ($2,366,224) | ($2,848,687) | ($3,586,181) | ($3,693,766) | ($3,804,579) |
| Management fee | ($99,130) | ($229,733) | ($289,208) | ($297,884) | ($306,821) |
| Property tax | ($307,913) | ($307,913) | ($307,913) | ($307,913) | ($307,913) |
| Replacement reserve | ($33,200) | ($33,200) | ($33,200) | ($33,200) | ($33,200) |
| Net operating income | ($823,874) | $1,175,124 | $1,567,660 | $1,624,924 | $1,683,905 |
| Debt service (as restructured) | ($1,081,141) | ($1,081,141) | ($1,081,141) | ($1,081,141) | ($1,081,141) |
| Cash flow after debt service | ($1,905,015) | $93,983 | $486,520 | $543,783 | $602,764 |
| DSCR | -0.77x | 1.08x | 1.45x | 1.50x | 1.55x |
The pro forma shows the shape that drives every new seniors housing loan: net operating income of ($823,874) in Year 1 while the building fills, $1,175,124 in Year 2 and $1,567,660 once occupancy stabilizes. The Year 1 loss and Year 1 debt service are what the operating deficit escrow must carry. After Year 3, income grows only with rates, so coverage improves slowly, from 1.45x to 1.55x by Year 5.
The insured loan is sized by coverage, not by cost.
| Year | NOI | Debt service, proposed | DSCR, proposed | Debt service, restructured | DSCR, restructured | Floor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | ($823,874) | $2,194,461 | -0.38x | $1,081,141 | -0.77x | 1.45x |
| Year 2 | $1,175,124 | $2,194,461 | 0.53x | $1,081,141 | 1.08x | 1.45x |
| Year 3 (test year) | $1,567,660 | $2,194,461 | 0.71x | $1,081,141 | 1.45x | 1.45x |
| Year 4 | $1,624,924 | $2,194,461 | 0.74x | $1,081,141 | 1.50x | 1.45x |
| Year 5 | $1,683,905 | $2,194,461 | 0.76x | $1,081,141 | 1.55x | 1.45x |
| Test | Rule | As proposed | As restructured |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity injection | Maximum loan-to-cost 90.0% Source [34][58] | 10.0% (meets) | 52.8% (meets) |
| Debt service coverage | Coverage of 1.45x Source [34][59] | 0.71x on Year 3 (fails) | 1.45x on Year 3 (meets) |
As proposed: the sponsor proposes the maximum 90% loan to cost, leaving 10% equity, with 10.0% equity ($3,307,248) and $29,765,234 of debt. The structure does not qualify: coverage falls below the floor.
As restructured: 52.8% equity ($16,404,220) and $14,664,379 of debt with $1,081,141 of annual debt service. Every test is met.
As proposed. The sponsor asks for the full $29,765,234 that a 90.0% loan to cost allows. The equity test passes on cost, because 90.0% is the program's cost ceiling, though the value test would need an appraisal of 120.0% of cost; debt service of $2,194,461 is covered only 0.71x by Year 3 income, far below the 1.45x floor. HUD would not insure that loan.
As restructured. Lowering the loan until Year 3 coverage reaches the floor gives an insured loan of $14,664,379 with $1,081,141 of annual debt service, including the premium. The sponsor's equity rises to $16,404,220, 52.8% of cost. Coverage is 1.08x in Year 2, still in lease-up, and 1.55x by Year 5.
That equity is the finding, and it is not a quirk of the model. It follows from two sourced facts: development costs of $388,830 a unit nationally [45] and Boerne rates below national levels. The sponsor has three ways to close the gap, and each needs evidence the research does not hold: a building that costs less per unit (fewer amenities or a smaller footprint), rates closer to national levels (which the phone survey and the appraiser must support), or a non-profit structure that lifts the value test and may reduce property tax. A bank construction loan with a later 223(f) refinance does not escape the arithmetic, because the refinance is sized on the same stabilized income.
The occupancy that covers the restructured loan.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Underwritten occupancy, Year 3 | 88.0% |
| Annual debt service (as restructured) | $1,081,141 |
| Occupancy at which NOI equals debt service (1.00x) | 65.6% (74.5% of underwritten) |
| Cushion before cash break-even | 25.5% |
| Occupancy at which coverage equals the 1.45x floor | 88.0% (100.0% of underwritten) |
On the restructured loan, the community covers its debt service at 65.6% average occupancy in Year 3, a cushion of 25.5% below the underwritten level, and meets the floor at 88.0%. Because the loan was sized to the floor, the floor occupancy equals the underwritten occupancy: there is no room for a weaker stabilization without the loan shrinking further.
A break-even at that level is comfortable for a stabilized community and uncomfortable in lease-up, when occupancy passes through that level during Year 2. Our note on the break-even occupancy trap explains why the lender should look at the months spent below break-even, not just the stabilized cushion, and the note on absorption forensics sets out how to test a lease-up pace when, as here, no local move-in data exist.
Occupancy and the assisted living rate set the coverage.
| Occupancy \ Assisted living rate | -15% | -8% | 0% | +8% | +15% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -15% | 1.03x | 1.11x | 1.18x | 1.25x | 1.33x |
| -8% | 1.15x | 1.23x | 1.31x | 1.39x | 1.47x |
| 0% | 1.27x | 1.36x | 1.45x | 1.53x | 1.62x |
| +5% | 1.35x | 1.44x | 1.53x | 1.62x | 1.71x |
| +10% | 1.43x | 1.53x | 1.62x | 1.72x | 1.81x |
DSCR in Year 3 on the restructured loan. Rows change occupancy; columns change assisted living rate. Green meets the 1.45x floor, amber covers debt service but misses the floor, red does not cover debt service. The outlined cell is the underwritten case.
The two drivers that matter most are stabilized occupancy and the assisted living rate, which applies to most of the units. Across the grid, Year 3 coverage on the restructured loan runs from 1.03x to 1.81x. Any shortfall in occupancy or rate without an offsetting gain in the other takes coverage below the floor, because the loan was sized exactly to it; no cell falls below 1.00x, because the restructured loan is small relative to income.
The practical reading is about direction. If the phone survey shows that a new building can command rates at the upper end of the grid, the insured loan grows and equity falls. If it shows Boerne families will not pay a new-building premium, the loan shrinks further. The memory care rate is not in the grid, but it moves coverage in the same direction on fewer units.
Every input, with its source or its stated assumption.
Program terms marked secondary come from lender or broker summaries rather than HUD's handbook. The largest assumptions are the two monthly rates, the lease-up curve, the operating cost ratio and the interest and premium rates.
| Input | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Site, acres | 4.4 | Source [44] |
| Land price per acre, Boerne ETJ near I-10 | $300,000 | Assumption: A round assumption inside the range two cited Boerne asks set: 2.56 acres on I-10 at $1,200,000 and a 45.4-acre tract at $8,000,000 [5][6]. No single listing's ask is used; an appraisal sets the value. |
| Building, sq ft (median AL/MC community) | 75,350 | Source [44] |
| Hard cost per sq ft | $262.75 | Source [45] |
| Soft cost per sq ft | $58.75 | Source [45] |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment per unit | $11,900 | Source [45] |
| Hard-cost contingency | 5.0% | Assumption: The research has no San Antonio cost index; Weitz's 2026 mid-level AL range of $281 to $358 per sq ft (city index 100, excluding sitework) sits above the CBRE hard cost [46], so a contingency is carried until HUD's cost review. |
| Groundbreaking to opening, months | 24 | Source [47] |
| Average share of the loan outstanding during the build | 50.0% | Assumption: Loan draws rise from zero to the full loan, so about half is outstanding on average. |
| HUD application, inspection, lender, legal and title fees, share of the loan | 2.5% | Assumption: The research gives a 0.3% application fee [58] but no inspection, placement or legal fees for Section 232; 2.5% of the loan is a placeholder for the lender's fee schedule. |
| Working capital escrow, share of the loan | 4.0% | Source [34][59] |
| Initial operating deficit escrow | $1,600,000 | Assumption: HUD sizes this escrow on Form HUD-91128-ORCF from the lease-up cash flows [43]; the research gives no amount. The placeholder covers most of the Year 1 shortfall in this model and is replaced by the lender's calculation. |
| Assisted living units | 59 | Assumption: The median AL/MC community has 83 units [44]; the mix follows a recent 63 AL and 26 MC proposal and Franklin Park's own AL-heavy mix [9]. |
| Memory care units | 24 | Assumption: About 29% of the 83 units, a secured wing; Franklin Park holds 38 Alzheimer beds among 96 licensed [9]. |
| Assisted living monthly rate with care, Year 1 | $5,700 | Assumption: No operator posts rates. Local quotes run $3,930 to $6,430 at Franklin Park [10] and $4,534 for a one-bedroom in Fair Oaks Ranch [24]; the South Central regional average fee with care was $5,658 in FY2024 [44]. A new building prices near the top of the local range. |
| Memory care monthly rate with care, Year 1 | $7,500 | Assumption: Local memory care quotes run from $5,160 [20] to $6,027 for a one-bedroom in Fair Oaks Ranch [24]; the South Central regional memory care fee was $7,298 in FY2024 [44]. A new secured wing prices above the older local stock. |
| Annual rate increase | 3.0% | Assumption: Below the 5.3% in-place assisted living rate growth NIC MAP reported for June 2026 [49], because a lease-up community discounts to fill. |
| Average occupancy | 32.0% / 72.0% / 88.0% / 88.0% / 88.0% | Assumption: Lease-up follows an S-curve, with stabilization by years 3 to 4 in NIC's analysis [50]. Stabilized occupancy of 88% sits below the 89.1% national assisted living rate for 3Q 2026 [48] and above the 86.6% median for AL/MC communities in FY2024 [44]. |
| Stabilized occupancy used to size fixed costs | 88.0% | Assumption: Same as the stabilized occupancy above. |
| Operating cost excluding management fee, property tax and reserves, share of revenue | 62.0% | Assumption: Labor alone ran 47.2% of revenue at the median AL/MC community in FY2024, and total operating expense 77.7% including the management fee [44]. The model holds 62% for labor, food, utilities, insurance, marketing and administration. |
| Share of stabilized operating cost carried during lease-up | 70.0% | Assumption: A licensed community must staff and run the building before it fills; 70% of the stabilized cost is the floor. |
| Management fee, share of revenue | 5.0% | Source [44] |
| Combined ETJ property tax rate (county, Boerne ISD, Cow Creek GCD), tax year 2025 | 1.39% | Source [27] |
| Replacement reserve per unit per year | $400 | Assumption: HUD sets the reserve for replacement in its firm commitment; the research has no figure. |
| Maximum loan to cost, Section 232 new construction (secondary) | 90.0% | Source [34][58] |
| Maximum loan to value, for-profit borrower, Section 232 new construction (secondary) | 75.0% | Source [34][58] |
| Minimum DSCR, Section 232 new construction (secondary) | 1.45x | Source [34][59] |
| Note rate, fixed | 6.00% | Assumption: The research has no dated Section 232 rate. The 10-year Treasury was 4.23% on March 11, 2026 [60]; the model uses 6.00% fixed, set at rate lock |
| Annual mortgage insurance premium, Section 232 new construction without tax credits | 0.77% | Source [64] |
| Amortization after construction (secondary) | 40 years | Source [58] |
What could break this community's coverage.
- Rates that do not reach new-building levels. Boerne's quoted rates are below the model's opening rates, and they come from aggregators, not operators. If the market will not pay a premium, both the coverage test and the value test cut the loan.
- A slower lease-up. The research has no local move-in pace. Each month of slower absorption extends the operating deficit and eats into the escrow, which the sponsor must top up.
- Labor. Labor is close to half of revenue in combined communities [44], and no local wage data were found. A tight San Antonio labor market would raise the cost floor during lease-up.
- Competition from an established brand. Franklin Park is an established 2017 community with memory care and room to cut price, and Morningside's campus feeds its own residents into its care levels.
- Program terms in flux. The handbook chapter, the working capital rule and the premium are draft or unconfirmed. A tighter working capital rule shrinks the loan; a confirmed lower premium lets it grow.
- Value below cost. Existing communities trade far below the cost of building new ones [50][45]; Class A assisted living cap rates were 6.5% and memory care 8.0% in April 2026 [53]. The appraisal may limit the loan below the coverage result.
- Utilities and impact fees. The tract's service area, capacity and fees are unknown, and Boerne's rates are rising.
- Closures in Texas. HHS's closure registry recorded assisted living closures through September 29, 2026 [57]; small operators exit when lease-up or staffing fails, which is the risk this case's escrows are meant to absorb.
Two other Texas cases on this site show related tests. The Texas agency multifamily case sizes a loan by coverage and value under agency rules, the same discipline Section 232 applies, and the Johnson City lodging case tests a Hill Country project a few counties away whose lease-up also carries the loan. The Texas hotel case shows another operating-business real estate loan with a ramp to stabilization. The assisted living and memory care hub covers the subtypes and review patterns, and the Texas market page and San Antonio metro page place Boerne in its region.
Conditions before this loan is underwritten.
Each condition answers an item the research could not find, a program term that rests on a secondary or draft source, or an assumption in the model. There are 19.
- Confirmation from HUD's Handbook 4232.1 and the lender's term sheet of the new-construction loan-to-cost, loan-to-value, coverage and working capital limits used here.
- The annual mortgage insurance premium that applies to this Section 232 new-construction loan, in writing.
- The note rate and term at rate lock, including any construction-period terms.
- The final status of the draft Section 232 appraisal chapter and the draft MAP efficiency letter, and which version governs this application.
- A lender-ordered appraisal with an integrated market study by an independent appraiser, including the "as completed and stabilized" value, the primary market area and monthly cash flows to stabilization.
- Written confirmation from HHSC on licensing (facility licence and Alzheimer certification), and the appraiser's documentation that no certificate-of-need agency applies to assisted living in Texas.
- A phone survey of rates, levels of care, community fees, occupancy and waitlists at every competitor, including Heritage Place and Hill Country Assisted Living, with HHSC licence records to confirm capacity and licence type for all of them.
- A drive-time tabulation of age- and income-qualified households, daytime employment and the referral base, including the nearest inpatient hospital and the status of any planned hospital in Boerne.
- The appraisal district parcel record, owner and value for the tract bought, and the agricultural rollback amount.
- Electric and gas service area, water and wastewater capacity letters, and the impact fees per unit of service.
- The FEMA flood zone and FIRM panel.
- A Phase I environmental site assessment.
- A TxDOT traffic count and access review for the site's roads.
- HUD's cost review, a general contractor's bid and the San Antonio construction cost index.
- The initial operating deficit escrow calculated on Form HUD-91128-ORCF from the lease-up cash flows, and the reserve for replacement HUD sets.
- Property tax: the assessment basis the appraisal district will use, any emergency services district or special district levy, and confirmation of the for-profit sponsor's tax status.
- Insurance terms for wind, flood and wildfire.
- Operator experience and the management agreement, with the operator's lease-up record for comparable memory care.
- Any Section 232 closings in Kendall or Bexar County from 2024 to 2026, to benchmark the loan, and the site's status for USDA rural, HUBZone and Opportunity Zone programs.
Questions lenders ask about this HUD 232 case.
Can the sponsor's own feasibility study serve as HUD's market study?
No. For Section 232 new construction, HUD's draft Chapter 5 puts the market study inside the appraisal, written by the appraiser, ordered and paid for by the lender, with the appraiser barred from any tie to the borrower, developer or lender [43]. A sponsor's study like this one is useful before the application, to decide whether the deal can work; it does not replace the lender's appraisal exhibit.
Why does a 90% loan-to-cost request fail when HUD allows 90%?
Loan to cost is only one of three limits. The insured loan is the lesser of the cost test, a value test and a coverage test [58][34]. In Boerne, local rates produce stabilized income that covers a 90% loan well short of the coverage floor, so the coverage test sets the loan, not the cost test.
Does Texas require a certificate of need for an assisted living community?
The research behind this case found no Texas certificate-of-need requirement for assisted living. The state licenses the community instead, through HHSC's facility licence and a separate Alzheimer certification for a memory care unit [31]. Because HUD's handbook asks for an independent market need study where no state CON agency exists [61], the appraiser's market study carries more weight here, not less.
What Section 232 terms in this case still need confirmation?
The loan-to-cost, coverage and working-capital figures come from lender and broker term sheets, not from HUD's handbook. The model carries the 0.77% Section 232 premium from HUD's June 2025 rate table [64] because whether the later 0.25% multifamily rate reaches Section 232 is unconfirmed, the handbook chapter on appraisals is a draft, and there is no dated interest rate in the research. Each is a lender condition, and each moves the loan amount.
Would a bridge loan and a later HUD refinance work better here?
It is the more common route. In fiscal 2025, 329 of HUD's 337 Section 232 closings were 223(f) refinances or acquisitions and only seven were new construction and other [38]. A sponsor that builds with a bank construction loan and refinances after stabilization still needs the equity this case shows, because the refinance is sized on the same income.
How sensitive is the loan to occupancy in Boerne?
Very. Coverage reaches the floor only at the underwritten stabilized occupancy, so any shortfall reduces the loan HUD will insure. The sensitivity table shows the combined effect of lower occupancy and lower assisted living rates; a lender should read it alongside the memory care wing's lease-up, which carries the higher rate and the higher staffing cost.
Testing a seniors housing project for HUD or agency debt? Start with the stabilized income.
We build the supply, rate and lease-up evidence a lender's underwriter and appraiser will test, with every figure dated and sourced.
Request a methodology briefingData sources and dates
Every market figure on this page traces to a named, dated source. Program terms that rest on lender or broker summaries are marked secondary, and model inputs the research does not give are labelled assumptions.
- U.S. Census Bureau, QuickFacts: Boerne city, Texas; Kendall County, Texas; Texas, Vintage 2025 (July 1, 2025) and ACS 2020-2024.
- U.S. Census Bureau, QuickFacts: Boerne city, Texas; United States, April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2025.
- Data Commons, Boerne, Texas place page (median age), 2024.
- CultureMap San Antonio, Fastest growing cities: Boerne, Selma (StorageCafe study), April 16, 2025.
- tx-cre.com, SABOR MLS 1937929, 2.56 acres of I-10 frontage land, Boerne, listed January 30, 2026; Active Option October 2026.
- LandWatch, Boerne, Texas commercial property for sale, October 2026.
- City of Boerne, Planning Department, accessed October 2026.
- My Boerne News, Boerne Utilities proposes water, wastewater rate increase to fund rising costs, service improvements, 2025.
- Assisted Living Magazine, Franklin Park Boerne (licence and capacity), licence July 17, 2017 to July 17, 2027.
- FamilyAssets, Franklin Park Boerne, October 2026.
- Morningside Ministries, Morningside at Menger Springs, page modified September 24, 2026.
- Community Impact, Learn about 12 senior living communities in and around Boerne and Fair Oaks Ranch, December 10, 2025.
- U.S. News and World Report, Heritage Place of Boerne, 2025-26.
- Seniorly, Heritage Place of Boerne, October 2026.
- Greater Boerne Chamber of Commerce, Member directory, Heritage Place at Boerne, October 2026.
- SeniorLiving.org, Assisted living in Boerne, Texas, 2026.
- Seniorly, Boerne Assisted Living (Wholehearted Senior Living at Boerne), October 2026.
- Hummingbird Assisted Living and Memory Care, Home page, checked October 15, 2026.
- Zabalist (Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation data), TABS2019006483, assisted living home, Boerne, registered March 7, 2019; inspection January 2021.
- FamilyAssets, Memory care in Boerne, Texas, October 2026.
- SeniorHomes.com, Kendall County, Texas senior living, October 2026.
- Avir Health Group, Avir at Boerne, 2025-26.
- FamilyAssets, Avir at Boerne (nursing home), September 2026.
- Mirador Living, Fair Oaks Ranch assisted living, October 2026.
- San Antonio Express-News (MySA), Boerne's Buc-ee's site to neighbor $30M senior build, October 14, 2025.
- Community Impact, Boerne Buc-ee's final plat approved by Planning and Zoning Commission, January 15, 2026.
- City of Boerne, Current Tax Rates, tax year 2025.
- San Antonio Express-News (MySA), Boerne ISD tax hike, November 2025.
- Community Impact, Boerne residents to see higher water bills as new rates take effect, February 3, 2025.
- My Boerne News, Budget 2026: council hears update on utilities CIP, FY2026.
- Texas Health and Human Services Commission, How to Become an Assisted Living Facility Provider, 2026.
- Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, Architectural Barriers project record TABS2026017158 (registration and inspection example), 2026.
- City of Boerne, 2026 Plat Submittal Calendar, 2026.
- ADROC Capital, FHA 232 (program summary), 2026.
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Mortgagee Letter 2025-02, January 2025.
- Federal Register (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development), FR-6522-N-02, Changes in Mortgage Insurance Premiums Applicable to FHA Multifamily Insurance Programs, September 23, 2025.
- McKnight's Senior Living, FHA closes landmark year with $8.1B in firm commitments, $6B in mortgages in senior living and care, FY2025.
- Seniors Housing Business, HUD Healthcare Lenders Post Phenomenal FY 2025 Due to Pent-Up Demand, FY2025.
- HUD Office of Inspector General, Report 2026-BO-0001, HUD did not always address risks reported by borrowers' audited financial statements, April 2, 2026.
- Freddie Mac, Optigo Seniors Housing Loan term sheet, current term sheet, accessed October 2026.
- Fannie Mae, Financial Supplement Q1 2025, March 31, 2025.
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Drafting Table Mortgagee Letter, Multifamily Improvements for MAP Efficiency (draft), February 26, 2026 (draft; final status not found).
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Residential Care Facilities, Section 232 Handbook, Section II, Production, Chapter 5, Appraisal Reports and Market Studies (Drafting Table redline), undated draft revision, accessed October 2026; final adoption not found.
- ASHA, Argentum, LeadingAge, NCAL and NIC, The State of Seniors Housing 2025, fiscal year 2024 data, published September 2025.
- CBRE, 2026 Senior Housing Development Costs, July 8, 2026 (projects Q3 2023 to Q2 2026).
- Senior Housing News, Construction Challenges Linger, Tempering Hopes of Senior Living Development Uptick in 2026 (Weitz cost brief), May 18, 2026.
- NIC MAP, Senior Housing Occupancy Crosses 90% for the First Time Since 2007, July 15, 2026.
- National Investment Center for Seniors Housing and Care (NIC), Senior Housing Occupancy Nears Record High as Majority of Markets Surpass 90%, October 1, 2026 (3Q 2026 data).
- National Investment Center for Seniors Housing and Care (NIC), Rate Growth Moderates for Independent Living and Assisted Living in 2Q 2026, June 2026 data.
- National Investment Center for Seniors Housing and Care (NIC), Senior Housing as an Alternative Asset Class: A Data-First View, Q4 2025 data, 2026.
- National Investment Center for Seniors Housing and Care (NIC), Senior Housing: A Sector Moving at Two Speeds Entering 2026, entering 2026.
- National Investment Center for Seniors Housing and Care (NIC), The Sticky Nature of Senior Housing Penetration, May 13, 2024 (2017 to 2023 data).
- CBRE, U.S. Senior Housing and Care Investor Survey H1 2026, June 25, 2026 (April 2026 survey).
- CareScout (Genworth), Cost of Care Survey 2025, July to November 2025.
- Alzheimer's Association, 2026 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures, 2026.
- CDC National Center for Health Statistics, Biennial Overview of Post-acute and Long-term Care (NPALS 2020), 2020 survey (November 2020 to July 2021).
- Texas Health and Human Services, Assisted Living Facility Closures, February 2025 to September 29, 2026 entries.
- Lument, FHA HUD 232 New Construction / Sub Rehab term sheet, current term sheet, accessed October 2026.
- Greystone, FHA/HUD Section 232 term sheet, June 2020.
- Seniors Housing Business, Quality Operators Stand Out, Say Lenders, June 22, 2026 roundtable (rates as of March 11, 2026).
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Section 232 Handbook, Section II, Production, Chapter 2, current handbook, accessed October 2026.
- Sonida Senior Living, Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1, second quarter 2026 results, August 10, 2026.
- Brookdale Senior Living, Form 10-K, fiscal year 2025, fiscal year 2025.
- Federal Register (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development), Elimination of Green and Energy Efficient Mortgage Insurance Premium Rate Category Applicable to Section 232 Mortgages, June 26, 2025.